chore: fix JavaScript lint errors (issue #8483)

[DivyanshuVortex]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:

• task: lint_filenames
  status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig
  status: passed
• task: lint_markdown
  status: na
• task: lint_package_json
  status: na
• task: lint_repl_help
  status: na
• task: lint_javascript_src
  status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_cli
  status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples
  status: na
• task: lint_javascript_tests
  status: na
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
  status: na
• task: lint_python
  status: na
• task: lint_r
  status: na
• task: lint_c_src
  status: na
• task: lint_c_examples
  status: na
• task: lint_c_benchmarks
  status: na
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
  status: na
• task: lint_shell
  status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations
  status: passed
• task: lint_typescript_tests
  status: na
• task: lint_license_headers
  status: passed

---

Resolves #8483 .

Description

This pull request fixes JavaScript linting errors detected in the automated lint workflow.
The main issues were:

• Executable JSDoc examples in @stdlib/_tools/github/create-repo that triggered real GitHub API requests during linting.
• Example files that executed top-level code, also triggering API calls.
• Unused/invalid ESLint disable directives.

This PR updates these files to ensure that all JavaScript lint tasks pass reliably without executing network requests or failing doctest parsing.

Related Issues

• Fix JavaScript lint errors #8483

Questions

No.

Other

No additional notes.

Checklist

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
fs/read-dir	$\color{green}171/171$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}7/7$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00%$	$\color{green}171/171$ $\color{green}+100.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.